Coronavirus - deep state command post exercise

Admin

41-58 minutes

MOSCOW, 26 May 2020, RUSTRAT Institute. Situation assessment.

1.1 The origin problem.

Two versions of the origin of the coronavirus epidemic, natural and artificial, tend towards the second one. On the basis of the accumulated body of data, it is now fairly certain that the epidemic is man-made.

1. this has been confirmed by a number of internationally renowned doctors. Vladimir Nikiforov, head of the department of infectious diseases at the Institute of Continuing Medical Education at the Federal Biomedical Agency of the Russian Federation, for instance, says that COVID-19 goes against the laws of classical epidemiology and is characterized by strange symptoms:

"Changes in the lungs, which develop in the background of the disease, sometimes do not correspond to the patients' well-being. For example, patients who have severe pneumonia may feel very well at first but then experience a sharp deterioration in their condition. Also, COVID-19 pneumonia is often difficult to detect on X-rays, which is something the medical profession has never seen before.

Pathologist Alexander Ediger says COVID-19 patients are not developing 'pure' pneumonia but something else: 'It's not pneumonia... We are dealing with a very specific kind of lung damage. The virus has given us a lot of surprises.

Pneumonia is characterised by an inflammatory origin of the disease with a microbial or microbial-viral pathogen, or with the formation of a complex association of pathogens, after which a local inflammatory response develops, he said. In coronavirus, the vascular walls and blood cells are affected, and the lungs are the target organ, but they are not the number one target organ".

Igor Nikulin, a former member of the UN Biological Weapons Commission, holds a similar view: "COVID-19 is assembled from three parts: bat coronavirus, snake coronavirus and a component of HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) - a glycoprotein protein. Such a combination could not occur in nature. The spread, especially in Iran and Italy, suggests that a different strain (of the virus) is already there because it is much more lethal. I think it is a throw-in."

Alexander Butenko, Professor and Laureate of the State Prize for Science and Technology and D.I. Ivanovsky Prize in Virology: "The current technologies for molecular genetic research are so advanced, exceptionally interesting and modern, that it is practically impossible. On the basis of these technologies, it is possible to create, for example, an attenuated strain of a virus; it is possible to create vaccines, chimeric constructs, and a great many things, even to synthesise medium viral particles. Theoretically, this option is possible."

Alexander Lukashev, Director of the Institute of Medical Parasitology, Tropical and Vector-Borne Diseases of Sechenov University, Doctor of Medicine, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences: "We take the bat virus, take human cells, infuse the virus, carry out certain manipulations and, in the end, we get a bat virus re-adapted to humans. It is perfectly possible, this is standard toolkit in virology."

2. a juxtaposition of some events suggests this. August 5, 2019 New York Times article about the closure of a military biological laboratory in the US for security reasons.

On 11 September 2019, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports 450 cases of infection with an unknown lung disease in 33 states. Symptoms included cases of pneumonia, shortness of breath, cough, fever, cramps and breathing problems. Vapers and vapers were then blamed for the disease.

On October 18-27, 2019, the World Military Games were held in Wuhan, China, with 200 US military personnel participating.

On 17 November 2019, the first case of coronavirus infection, now known as COVID-19, was officially reported in Wuhan.

3. Most importantly, there is reason to believe that the US and China have worked together to develop this virus. At the end of the article in Nature Medicine, dated 9 November 2015, there is a list of organisations that have sponsored US scientists' experiments to create a mutant virus in the laboratory.

Here is part of the original citation: "Research in this manuscript was supported by grants from the National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Disease and the National Institute of Aging of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) under awards U19AI109761 (R. S.B.), U19AI107810 (R.S.B.), AI085524 (W.A.M.), F32AI102561 (V.D.M.) and K99AG049092 (V.D.M.), and by the National Natural Science Foundation of China awards 81290341 (Z.- L.S.) and 31470260 (X.-Y.G.), and by USAID-EPT-PREDICT funding from EcoHealth Alliance (Z.-L.S.).

The translation into Russian is as follows: "The research outlined in this manuscript was supported by grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Institute of Aging of the US National Institutes of Health U19AI109761 (R.S.B.), U19AI107810 (R.S.B.), AI085524 (W.A.M.), F32AI102561 (V.D.M.) and K99AG049092 (V.D.M.), grants 81290341 (Z.- L.S.) and 31470260 (X.-Y.G.), as well as USAID-EPT-PREDICT funding from the EcoHealth Alliance (Z.-L.S.)."

A number of attentive experts found several Chinese names on the list of authors of the University of North Carolina study. There is a woman on that list - Zhengli-Li Shi (Zhengli-Li Shi). Zhengli-Li Shi is a Chinese virologist and researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Incidentally, it was Zhengli-Li Shi who diagnosed an epidemic of a new coronavirus in Wuhan in December 2019.

4 That the virus was being developed in several places is also confirmed by the following information. Cambridge scientists have found that the Wuhan virus genome isolated on 24 December 2019 is not the original virus strain (A), but already a secondary strain (B).

Virologists clearly call strain A the original, "parent" strain - it is most similar to the putative ancestor found in 2013 in horseshoe bats (which do not infect humans, as far as we know). Accordingly, strain B is clearly descended from strain A, and strain C from strain B, being a grandchild, so to speak.

Geographically, they are now distributed as follows: strain A can be found in small numbers in some Chinese cities, but not in Wuhan. Its main area of distribution is in the US, its western part being the Pacific coast, Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego. As well as Australia and the coast of Latin America. Two-thirds of the infections in the US are caused by this very A strain.

Type B is raging on the east coast of the US, particularly New York, but also in Europe and China. The Wuhan epidemic was almost entirely caused by the B strain, but British scientists have concluded that the strain entered the USA via Europe.

The C strain, the scientists concluded, had split off from the B strain somewhere outside PRC and entered Europe presumably from Singapore, but not many infections.

So, how is it that the 'daughter' strain B has spread in Wuhan, as it were at the centre of the epidemic, while the original A strain ended up mainly in the USA?

5. A detailed examination of the structure of the coronavirus from a genetic point of view also indicates its artificial nature.

Thus, there is every reason to believe that the prototype new coronavirus COVID-19 was created in the two countries in laboratory conditions by scientists from the USA and China with mutual funding.

However, a number of questions remain. How did the virus get loose: was it accidentally or deliberately? By whom? And why a different strain of the virus in China than in Italy or the US?

After the US and UK planting, it is even more likely that the coronavirus is a biological weapon. And the coronavirus epidemic is a command-and-control exercise by the global deep state to prevent Trump from being re-elected this year and move to increase control of the world's population at the same time as reducing its numbers.  Resources are running out.

There will be no nuclear wars so as not to contaminate the environment with radioactive contamination. There will be exclusively combat viruses with a limited sector of impact - age, race, region of the world. And "natural origin" viruses, where it is not known whom to retaliate against.

What is happening is the first exercise of its kind. So far, with very mild, as the socio-economic effects and socio-political consequences were not understood. The global elite decided not to wait any longer and prepared its own tough response to the challenge from China.

But now, in principle, the command post exercise can be considered as having taken place. All the pain points have been identified and the prediction of a tougher strike can be made. The experts correctly believe, and have convincingly argued with reference to the history of mankind, that no dominant country leaves the pedestal of war without a war. So the silence on the part of the US on the Chinese challenge has begun to raise questions. And now that silence has broken.

That group of the world elite that has taken over the US will not go to war against the rest of humanity with nuclear or any other total war. "Pure" biological warfare is its new method. And this method requires its own operational and systemic reflection.

In any case, today the situation with the coronavirus epidemic was immediately used in geopolitical struggle as part of the information warfare, so the likelihood of disinformation is high, involving a combination of real and fictitious facts, reticences and tendentious interpretations of half-truths.

The coronavirus epidemic has become a factor in global politics, including in superpower confrontations and struggles to maintain or transform international alliances, as well as for supremacy in existing and future alliances.

The effect of an accidental release of the COVID-19 virus, whether deliberately created or due to natural mutations, is fully equivalent to that of a deliberate act of widespread use of biological weapons. In both cases, events unfold in the same way, creating a vast field for interpretative propaganda.

The current COVID-19 pandemic must be considered in the context of the recent Salisbury incident. Despite an extensive network of US research centres in North Carolina, Harvard and Arkansas, much of the research was carried out in the UK, in Salisbury and Cambridge.

Funding was provided by Bill Gates and the COVID-19 Institute of Virology in Wuhan was funded by Soros. When one considers that coronavirus research was also conducted in Australia and Canada, London's role in the COVID-19 pandemic case becomes more significant than that of Washington.

One cannot rule out the version that the coronavirus epidemic serves as a pretext for universal chipping of the population. Then it will not be the national governments that will have power over the peoples, but those who control the chip technology. Those who oppose it will be subjected to further virus attacks.

1.2 Main medical problems.

The main medical problems for the present are the impossibility to determine the exact nature of the virus, its mechanism of invasion into the cell (at first scientists and physicians thought that it only affects the lungs, now it is possible that it affects the heart and there is a version that it is a new variant of HIV infection, versions are only increasing) and the mechanisms of fighting it.

Although about 40 species of coronavirus are already known to science, no cure has yet been found for any of them. In fact, doctors are treating the symptoms but not the causes.

In addition, new interpretations of its behaviour and mechanisms of infection are being discovered every day, as are methods of treatment. So, in essence, the world health system is operating in an online learning mode and without a reliable theory is trying to cope with the epidemic from the wheels.

The COVID-19 coronavirus epidemic has uncovered a number of key problems for global health, which can be divided into three main groups - medical epidemiological, organisational and systemic.

The medical epidemiological group includes:

1. The high dissimilarity of COVID-19 with all other 40 known medical coronavirus species. In terms of mechanism of infection, spread and effect on the human body. As knowledge accumulates, the fourth model of the disease is being disproved. This makes it extremely difficult to develop therapeutic agents and vaccines.

2. A significant proportion, at least 30-35% (some estimates range from 70-80%), of the total number of identified infected individuals are asymptomatic. This makes them vectors of disease transmission and complicates quarantine activities.

3. High mutagenicity. Three different strains have been confirmed to date and two more are strongly suspected. Outbreaks in China, Europe and the USA have been caused by different strains. There is no certainty that those who have been infected with one will become immune to the others.

4. In 8 out of 10 cases, COVID-19 causes a complication of other pre-existing diseases (cardiovascular, respiratory, allergies, chronic nervous tissue diseases). In a quarter of cases, even when COVID-19 itself is mild or moderately severe, recovered patients experience severe complications to the lungs and the ability of their red blood cells to carry oxygen.

The opinion of the renowned Italian virologist, Professor Giorgio Palo, is interesting. Unlike the Chinese researchers who focused mainly on controlling the spread of infection in the population, Italian virologists focused much of their attention on studying the cadavers of people who had died of coronavirus.

And they concluded that COVID-19 is not just a lung infection but something much more complex. It is a generalised inflammation affecting various organs: not only the lungs, but also the heart, kidneys and central nervous system. Thromboembolic abnormalities, having started in the lungs, may develop in parallel in several places in the body and aggravate the general course of the disease.

Apparently, it is impossible to stop the pandemic without the formation of mass group immunity. So far, 37 different vaccine formulations are being tested, but mass-ready results may not be available until November 2020.

Organisational measures include:

1. Unpreparedness of health systems to diagnose medical threats in a timely manner and of political leadership to respond swiftly and decisively to medical conclusions.

2. Failure of the health system to rapidly reformat health facilities to match the epidemiological profile.

3. a general lack of qualifications and discipline among health-care workers in general to perform anti-epidemiological activities. This applies especially to private clinics and the management of the health system as a whole. Ministries of Health in all countries are unable to keep up with the pace of developments and do not have a clear picture of what is happening. As a result, they make half-hearted, ill-timed or even simply wrong management decisions.

4. even the most obvious consumables (masks, gloves, shoe covers, protective suits), even for medical staff in infectious diseases departments, are not even approximately sufficiently stocked in emergency supplies. This results in the most valuable nursing staff being knocked out.

The systemic ones include:

1. WHO has failed to unify standards and coordinate the activities of ministries of health of individual countries. As a result of this there is not yet a common position of medical workers concerning the range and nature of measures which should be taken in the fight. The first reason is the lack of a unified medical approach, especially for the public;

2. The autonomy of doctors and authorities in each country leads to dramatic differences in the meaning of the statistics collected. For example, in the USA, those who die outside medical institutions are not tested for coronavirus, so they are not included in the statistics.

In Germany, COVID-19 is tested only in the presence of at least three symptoms, the other cases are considered to be simple acute respiratory infections and are not included in the statistics, even if the patient dies. This makes it difficult to adequately assess the key factors of the epidemic. For example, according to Chinese statistics, 1-1.2% of cases die, according to Italian statistics, from 8 to 14%, according to American statistics, from 11 to 18%.

3. the lack of a single or at least close standard of test systems results in a significant spread, from 75% to 30%, in the accuracy of their response. In addition, it is suspected that some of the test systems respond to antibodies not only from COVID-19 but also from other types of coronaviruses present in common acute respiratory infections. That is, a person labelled as having had COVID-19 may not actually have it.

4. the lack of a unified approach by medics in assessing even the available data, leading to sometimes diametrically opposed positions and recommendations, even among leading medical professionals, and even greater confusion in informing the public. Often leading to undermining of its quarantine compliance discipline.

1.3 Major economic problems.

In addition to its purely medical nature, the COVID-19 pandemic caused many economic problems. This is primarily due to the disruption of logistical links caused by quarantine.

Chinese GDP fell by 6.8% in the first quarter of 2020. Especially hard hit were the industrial sector (-62%), retail sales (-15.8%) and fixed asset investments (-16.1%). Beijing is hoping to compensate for the failure with accelerated growth in the remaining period and is making great efforts to do so.

Organizationally - by getting the companies up and running as quickly as possible - and financially through a program of incentives. But in any case the stated target of 6.4% GDP growth of the People's Republic of China will not be achieved in 2020. It is more likely to be zero or even negative.

The problem is compounded by the fact that the recovery of the Chinese economy is occurring at a time of pandemic expansion in the main markets - Europe and the USA. Consequently, there is still nowhere to market what is being produced. The country's domestic demand is only able to consume 50-55% of what it produces.

Due to the tightness of the markets, the leading countries have problems even with anti-epidemic measures. For example, India's ban on the export of medicines has completely shut down drug production in Europe and the US, where Indian formulations were only packaged under local brand names.

The cumulative economic loss to the global economy as of the second decade of April 2020 was 1.3% of GDP or $1.1 trillion. If the pandemic is not defeated by the end of July or the beginning of August, the global recession could reach 4.1% of GDP or $3.46 trillion.

The duration of a pandemic has a profound structural impact on the nature of the economic scale. The service sector is now the hardest hit, accounting for a fall in turnover of more than 89%. It generates the largest proportion of the total amount of unemployment arising but at the same time it generates the smallest (not more than 4%) share of tax revenues.

If the pandemic continues at least until mid-summer, the trade and the production of mass consumer goods will come under attack. About 40-50% of the population will simply run out of money, not only for long-term needs, but also for everyday life.

The problem will be long-lasting, because the general economic downturn will then leave no jobs with high wages. People will have to work under almost any conditions, hence for little money, which will keep the problem of low solvency of demand alive for a long period.

At the beginning of April, compared to January, 2020, air traffic was down 75%, tourist arrivals were down 92% and global industrial production was down almost 9%. This included a 17% drop in Europe and a 22% drop in the USA.

The unemployment rate in the USA jumped from 3 to 20 million, or 11.2% of the working-age population, in the space of two months. At the current rate, the number could reach 55 to 60 million by mid-June.

In Russia, unemployment has already increased from 2.5m to 3.4m and could rise to 8m by the end of this year in the all-white segment of the workforce alone. Including the grey segment as well as the self-employed and small businesses, this figure has the potential to double to 21.5% of Russia's working age population.

In the 75-year history of the IMF, the record of lump-sum applications for financial assistance from more than 90 countries has been broken. Characteristically, the Fund does not provide earmarked assistance to prop up the economy. As IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva has said, for countries with a sharply declining economy, the money should go towards salaries for doctors and nurses, to support hospitals and emergency departments, and to set up temporary hospitals.

In other words, logically speaking, it should be spent on overcoming the IMF- and WHO-imposed economic strangulation measures. The IMF is promising to double the allocation of resources from $50 billion to $100 billion, making the total amount of resources that the fund is willing to mobilise around $1 trillion. With these loans at close to zero percent, the standard IMF set of political-economic demands on the leadership of developing countries is to be expected, with the consequences already known.

Given the catastrophic budget gaps, this could be an attempt to bring key industrial assets under control. There is no doubt that the World Bank and EBRD will act in the same way as they did in the case of the $8 billion disbursement to Ukraine. A clincher for Ukraine is the law on the sale of agricultural land.

As acknowledged experts in this field, in particular alexsword, from Aftershock, point out - "the same conclusion is proved by the graph of the weekly increase of US GKOs on the balance sheet of the Fed, which characterizes the speed of the printing press. Its current speed is more than an order of magnitude faster than previous QE-1-2-3 records.  And it is twice as fast as the issuance of new GKOs. That is, the printing press not only fully redeems the new issue of T-bills, but also redeems an equal amount at the secondary market from those companies that run away from the market.

To recap, during the QE1-2-3 period the record was the monetisation of $120bn of government bonds per month. Now it is $70bn a day. The growth rate can be roughly estimated at 2000%. It is not fashionable in the US media and stock market circles to remember the dynamics of the US real sector, but we will nevertheless remember - the growth of US industrial production compared to 2007 was only 4.76% (this was in February, i.e. before the viral hysteria started).

Thus, the speed of the US printing press is growing at least 500 times faster than the real output (which is supposed to provide the money supply)".

The PRC, of all the economies in the world, has had its leverage unleashed. China has retained the potential for global expansion - if not through in-kind exports, then through financial aid. It may thus provide an alternative to the credit expansions of the Federal Reserve which are based on the hyper-emission of the money supply.

In such a clash of mutually exclusive flows, the temptation for a total demolition of the world financial system based on the dollar reserve and monetary system cannot but arise. In such a scenario, the role of Britain as the de facto price maker of gold as the main potential derivative of transition increases. This could provide an explanation for the active purchases of gold by Germany, China and Russia over the last few years.

1.4 The military and strategic accompaniment of the COWID attack.

The calendar synchronization of events allows to reveal the global political background of the "non-Chinese" wave of the coronavirus as a special operation in Europe and Russia. NATO's most ambitious combined arms exercise, Defender Europe 2020, announced for spring 2020, is in danger of being disrupted.

Austria, as a non-member of the NATO bloc, is closing the border with Italy on 9 March.

Citing a coronavirus epidemic, the Bundeswehr command withdrew from the manoeuvres on 13 March. It is also safe to assume that Germany, NATO's most important logistics hub, has closed its borders in advance to move the claimed 20,000 pieces of American equipment into Europe.

What follows is a succession of coincidences. Consistently, Norway refuses to participate in NATO exercises, citing a desire to maintain the capacity of its forces to "help the population" in an epidemic. Finland then refuses to send its observers and effectively closes the back-up route for NATO traffic through its territory.

On 6-12 March, according to uncontested Slovenian press reports, a US military contingent and some 20,000 pieces of military equipment, including heavy Abrams tanks, land in northern Italy in Verona and Trieste.

On 10-11 March the border with Italy is closed by neighbouring Slovenia. While for neutral Austria the closing of the border is a clear anti-NATO demarche by Chancellor Sebastian Kurz, the sudden blocking of traffic with Italy in Slovenia and traffic flow at the Slovenian-Croatian border are obvious actions of a different scenario.

The measure was implemented spontaneously, as evidenced by the chaos at the border crossings. No one was warned in advance that medical certificates were required (with a completely non-functional testing system). People trapped in convoys of heavy goods vehicles and private cars found themselves without food, water or medical care for three days.

For several years now, Slovenia has been seen by Germany and the US as a bridgehead in the struggle for control of its national interest zone. Apart from its central geographical location, Slovenia is interesting as the most developed EU country in terms of industrial capacity per capita - the world's most powerful and capitalised companies such as KRKA, Gorenje, high-tech companies, including the suppliers of Roscosmos and weapons manufacturers + its own nuclear power plant.

Last but not least, China's strong investment expansion in Slovenia's economy, in particular the purchase of electrical engineering company Gorenjer.

On the eve of the pandemic and the NATO exercises, the pro-German prime minister Marjan Šarec suddenly resigns voluntarily. The pro-American and pro-NATO leader of the extreme nationalists, Janez Janša, wins a hastily organised snap election. In his first official statement, he declares the new cabinet's priority as the fight against the coronavirus.

On March 12, on the eve of the NATO Defender exercise scheduled to begin on March 13, a total quarantine is declared in Slovenia - the first of the post-Yugoslav countries. Under the guise of quarantine, Jansa is in fact carrying out an act of coup d'état. Without parliamentary approval, all the leaders of the security bloc are replaced by pro-American oriented individuals.

On 13 March, a secret meeting of representatives from 28 NATO countries is held in Slovenia in the Alpine town of Pokljuvica under the guise of a "winter military camp".

The next day, Slovenian Armed Forces units begin erecting a long-term wire fence on the border with Croatia. The reason for this is a government decision, also not agreed by parliament. Once again, the country's constitution with a parliamentary form of government is violated.

On 9 April the quarantine regime in Slovenia is tightened. On the eve of Catholic Easter, the population is banned from visiting churches and cemeteries. The police go on strike and refuse to block the movement of people on Easter weekend. Roads are blocked by the army.

However, the official press explains the roadblocks by the army units as part of the NATO combined arms exercise "Preskok" (Leapfrog). Although officially the "Leap" exercise was cancelled due to a coronavirus.

The general mood is one of profound disbelief in the official version of the pandemic and a clear understanding of its political and economic subtext: a latent coup d'état and destruction of the economy.

A further parallel: neutral Austria abolishes the previous quarantine restrictions as of April 15th and allows the free movement of people and the operation of industry, commerce, services and education throughout the country. At the same time, it is keeping its borders closed.

The situation is as follows. The US has increased its military presence in the Balkans and Europe under the pretext of the coronavirus. Communications have been cut and links fractured in the emerging alternative NATO and EU alliance around the Austrian centre of power. The precedent has been set and the techniques of using the army against civilians have been practiced. The United States had in fact intercepted the Slovenian strategic bridgehead from Germany;

Large-scale military exercises during the quarantine period, synchronised with the dynamics of restrictive measures, suggest that NATO commanders do not attach importance to the threat of contamination. This may indicate a) the artificial nature of the virus and its modification SARS-CoV-2; b) the original non-lethality of the Covid-19 agent; c) the involvement of the Pentagon in the development of the strain(s).

How does Trump and Xi's original agreement on the division of spheres of influence, whereby the EU falls under an American protectorate and Russia enters China's sphere of interest, fit in with NATO's current activities in Europe?

His response to the apparent focal injection of a new strain of the SARS-CoV-2 virus into the New York metropolitan area is to close communications with Europe. Also indicative of Trump's stance on the instigators of the new strain being thrown in and the WHO and IMF quarantine measures destroying the world economy is the US President's 15 April announcement of his refusal to fund the WHO.

This does not contradict the logic of the massive redeployment of US troops to the European continent, to the "contamination zone". The Pentagon's actions in Europe should be assessed through the figure of Defence Secretary Mark Esper as being under the control of the Republican Senate majority.

It is possible that the exercise on an unprecedented scale was originally planned by Trump as a fix for his influence in the EU, and the injection of a modified strain (possibly based on Bill Gates Foundation research) of SARS-CoV-2 into Northern Italy was an attempt to counteract those plans. At the same time, a dismembered eurozone, the abolition of the Schengen agreement and a fragmented EU economy are blocking a Chinese-led export tsunami to Europe.

The spectacle played out by China's leadership in Wuhan, following the SARS-CoV-2 virus counterattack, is turning into signs that the anti-global coalition of Trump and Xi Jinping is splitting into spheres of influence. If Trump has set his sights on dismembering the European Union, blocking China's export potential, an indirect sign of the fracture in the relationship with Xi could be the Chinese representative at the UN criticising Trump for refusing to fund WHO.

With the withdrawal of Sanders' candidacy, the Democrats' attempt to hijack the 2020 electoral initiative in the face of the epidemic clearly reverts to a formula of preparing for revenge only in 2024. It is possible that the economic effect of throwing a modified virus into the US was such that it became easier for the Democrats to frame Trump in a future presidency for its consequences.

In such a scenario, Trump, who is used to bluffing on rate hikes, needs to level the playing field with China. In this optic, what is happening in Europe looks quite logical.

Conclusions.

Based on the above, the following preliminary conclusions can be drawn from the situation with the coronavirus epidemic.

1. The coronavirus is a light form of the biological weapon released into the world by a certain part of the world elite in order to conduct a social and organizational experiment.

The aims of the experiment are many. The main ones are:

a) to look at the organisational and social response of the population and leadership of the world's leading nations, who will do what and how;

b) to identify the most painful and most stable nodes of public infrastructure (medical, transport, industrial, energy, etc.) of the leading countries of the world;

c) look at how countries will deal with emerging conflict situations;

d) Analyse the response of the global financial, transport and communications, energy, food and agriculture and other sectors;

e) set the stage for mass chipping of the population. Whoever controls the chips will be the world government. Local governments will be in the status of viceroys of the central world government.

2. The past three months of the epidemic allow us to say that the result, for which these command and control exercises were conceived - obtaining information - has been achieved. The primary information by sectors of world economy and countries is practically collected, stage of its studying, processing, analysis and systematization is ahead.

3. the epidemic has shown that biological weapons are a far more effective form of attack than nuclear weapons. There is no radioactive contamination of territory, no destruction of infrastructure, and most importantly, there is no clear enemy to retaliate against.

4. Most likely, the population growth, depletion of world resources, and such operational factor as the emergence of leaders in Russia, the US and China, ready to break the globalist project of the future world, led the world deep state to the conclusion that serious steps, larger in scale than the attack in New York in 2001, should be taken to maintain its influence over the world.

5. Most likely, Operation Coronavirus was designed to put the Chinese economy down and stop there. However, China withstood the onslaught. It was then decided to extend the strike zone to Europe to put down China's main export market. At the same time, an oil and financial crisis was triggered. As a result, instead of attacking, the world's leading leaders found themselves in a defensive situation.

6. No more "open world" and "open society". The answer to the question "whose will you be?" remains key. Because practical protection for the citizen can only be provided by the state. If it is strong and effective. Or it cannot in all other cases.

The open world is not only impossible, it is directly detrimental because of the inevitable defeat in the competition with the big countries, territories and economies, which have not managed to consolidate themselves for whatever reason.

7. The world government, all international laws above national laws, the common labour and capital market, are a mere disguise for external economic expansion in order to maximise the size of the siphoning off of resources and profits from the territories under control.

8. All the talk of friendship at home has not stood the test of practice. Faced with a real threat, absolutely all the alliances (EU, NATO, the collective West, the Union of Belarus and Russia, etc.) immediately disintegrated along the national borders. In a number of cases, with a direct aggressive competition for the key resources, up to and including fights.

9. The current economic model has a critically low degree of resistance to negative factors. Especially of a dynamic nature.

9. The dominating democratic model of social organisation has a low adequacy of the governance model. It is not democratic but centralised, paternalistic societies and states that are most effective. Perhaps one of the aims of the pandemic is to move from a model of democratic liberalism to a model of digital liberal totalitarianism.

10. The geopolitical organisation of the world that prevailed after the collapse of the USSR is no longer sustainable. The US is unable to play the role of hegemon due to the loss of understanding of the multi-faceted basic meanings of this concept. And China cannot replace the US. Moreover, any such attempt would lead to a world even more colonial than the current one. Hence, by analogy with the history of the collapse of ancient Rome, a prolonged period of the Dark Ages awaits the world.

11. The key process of the near future will be the break-up of the common world into isolated political-economic clusters. This will include the collapse of many (most) currently existing alliances and unions. This applies primarily to the European Union, NATO and the established system of relations in Eastern Europe, Central Asia and the Middle East.

This pushes for a redivision of the world, where the impossibility of nuclear conflict is offset by the possibilities of biological warfare. The coronavirus is a new resource for warfare, and the first precedent for the active use of biological weapons in the struggle for the redivision of the spheres of influence.

The outbreak of a new world war is extremely unlikely, because of unacceptably high costs of the process and the absence of economic aims capable of recouping the expenses. However, the outbreak of local armed conflicts is more than probable. Particularly in Africa.

12. The greatest challenge in the next period will be to find new, sustainable forms of economic organisation. Be it state capitalism or unconditional basic incomes, the world will be confronted with more disruption than anything it has experienced in the last 150 to 180 years.

13. The development of the pandemic has shown that the health system of all nations is a weak point in their national security. While traditional weapons systems received preferential funding, health-care costs were being reduced as unproductive expenditures.

The rationale has been the evidence of rising prosperity and life expectancy, as well as budget priorities on structural investment projects. As a result, the collapse of health care comes when the daily increase in severe cases of 10,000 a day for ten days persists.

At this stage comes the acute shortage of medical staff, cut by the attrition of doctors due to illness. The lack of medication, hospital beds and ventilators necessitates the imposition of martial law, in which the economy collapses within a year and a half and the traditional institutions of government cease to exist, shifting to hard military or paramilitary regimes.

14. The national currency is in crisis and power is transferred to those who control the army, communication and navigation systems, automated control systems and provide a monopoly on information. Electronic payments, power plants, internet, media, pipelines and transport are taken under control. This is enough for any group to seize power.

15. The political system freezes in a state of extreme concentration of power. Democracy is winding down. Society itself demands greater oversight of people's behaviour, those who object are reviled as security threats and marginalised. New fault lines emerge in society, creating freedom of manoeuvre for groups aspiring to power.

16. WHO is becoming a subject of geopolitics, rapidly catching up with NATO and IMF in terms of influence and maintaining ties with all states over bloc borders. The US does not want to fund this process, but wants to force WHO to become a weapon against China. The fight for WHO becomes a fight for a key institution of influence in the next decade.

17. The hyper-emission of the dollar and the euro is a destabilising currency risk and an important incentive to cluster and create a system of alternative currencies evolving from electronic clearing systems to sustainable currency unions with their own electronic payment systems and reserve currencies of the strongest states.

18. The destruction of intentions in the creation of such systems is yet another incentive for the US and the "deep state" centered in London to use biological weapons as a major factor in the destruction of the economies and power of rival states.

Thus, the epidemic, whether artificial or natural, helps to solve the problem of reducing resistance to redistribution of the world on US terms in such a version of clustering, where American-style globalism will retain all its former positions, depriving all other cluster owners of the advantages.

The US will seek to embed itself in a polycentric world as a single common pole, to maintain control over local monetary and financial systems and will use all means to do so.

The new economic map of the world is in the process of being shaped. The use of viruses combined with trade wars, military pressure, technological leadership including social technology and flexible advance management technology, the application of artificial intelligence in the use of integrated, automated control systems operating with large databases, media domination - these are the tools of the struggle for borders on this map and the access codes to individual clusters.

Suggestions.

Based on the above, the following responses are proposed.

1. Comprehensive minimisation of the scale of increase in the number of cases and prevention of territorial expansion of the epidemic, i.e. the rapid passage of the epidemiological peak. For this purpose it is necessary to strengthen the quarantine regime in all cities with a population of millions and settlements, through which the main transport highways pass.

2. For the same purpose, all private movement between Russian regions, including oblasts, should be stopped for at least 1 month. Exceptions should be made only for the logistics of supplies and foodstuffs, which should be carried out under the strict control of the GIBDD.

3) Mass distribution of personal protective equipment (first of all masks, gloves and sanitizers) should be organized, with a total informing of the population on how to use it.

4. A radical change should be made in the media, especially in terms of stopping the spread of misleading, erroneous and especially biased information about COVID-19 itself and the alleged excessive strictness and apparent redundancy of quarantine measures due to over-estimation of the threat.

The Chinese experience of information management should be taken as a model, in which the threat is not discussed, alarmists are isolated and punished, as they themselves pose a direct threat to society. The control measures are disseminated widely in a positive light, and those directly involved in combating the epidemic, especially doctors and nurses, are portrayed as national heroes, respected and given full and material support as an absolute obligation of the state and society.

This is an important factor in the nation's cohesion and discipline in the face of danger. It is its neglect, in particular, that has led to a "shambolic" increase in the number of COVID-19 cases in Russia in mid-April 2020;

5. In order not to increase the number of bankruptcies of small and medium-sized enterprises and the number of self-employed, which will inevitably lead to a jump in long-term unemployment in the second half of 2020 and further to 2021, it is necessary to organise right now a one-off payment of the minimum wage to all working-age Russian citizens, without any income certificate or any other kind of document.

The desire to "help in a pinpoint manner" only theoretically saves the budget money in theory. In reality, this assistance is critically overdue, and in most cases, for bureaucratic reasons it does not reach the citizens who need it at all. As a consequence, the scale of the subsequent financial burden on the budget will be many times higher and much longer in time.

This means that instead of overall savings, there will be a loss, which will require many times more resources, and in a much more difficult economic environment. Whereas one-off simple direct payments, although seemingly significant - about 900 billion roubles a month - will nevertheless support the population, and thus the economy, for the period of quarantine measures. And also avoid mass bankruptcies in sectors of the economy which today employ at least 45 million people of working age.

6. During the crisis and its aftermath, a fundamental reorganisation of the trade system in Russia is essential. Now, particularly in large cities, faced with falling sales through retail chains, large food producers are actively setting up distance selling via the Internet with delivery.

In this case, the prices are at the level of large wholesale, which is on average 2 - 2.8 times lower than the shop shelves. Moreover, the goods themselves are sold in small wholesale or even retail quantities. Savings are achieved by reducing the number of intermediaries between producer and purchaser, as well as eliminating the costs of interaction with retail chains.

Supporting and developing this initiative contributes not only to the efficiency of quarantine measures, but also to the stability of the country's economy as a whole. This includes the end of the epidemic;

7. the economic impact of the epidemic allows for a better assessment of the extent to which the Russian economy is dependent on imports. This is especially important in order to clarify the markets and niches in which import substitution is feasible.

A certain significant increase in unemployment is inevitable after the epidemic. Overcoming it will require the creation of new jobs. And they better not be in the form of cheap janitors or low-skilled construction workers. The expansion of import substitution in the manufacturing sector is an effective solution to this problem.

The recommendations presented above are primarily of an operational nature. They above all aim to meet the challenge of moving past the peak of the epidemic as quickly as possible and to minimise the period of gradual relaxation of the devastating quarantine measures as the viral threat diminishes. So that the economy can return to business as usual as soon as possible.

But it should be noted that the epidemic will in any case have a negative economic impact that cannot be managed this year. For example, it is already clear that the tourist season of 2020 in Russia will fail. And that is about 7 million tourists inside the country and up to 1.5 million more inbound tourists from abroad, bringing Russia a total of 3.4 trillion rubles (by the end of 2019).

In order for the industry to recover by next season, measures to subsidise its crisis costs need to be developed and implemented as early as this year. The same applies to other sectors of the Russian economy.

8. Undertake a deep reboot of the media complex in order to prevent a mass psychosomatic epidemic. The current management of the leading federal channels has shown itself completely unprepared for the current challenge. Apart from a castastrophically missed information initiative. 

Despite the isolation of the target group at home - the loss of federal television to the Internet as a means of prompt information and shaping the dominant agenda. The situation will be exacerbated by the lack of broadcasting grids modified to fit the situation. One possible tool would be the creation of a media expert group with special status for managing the media complex and making operational decisions. 

The coronavirus epidemic creates favorable conditions for training and other mobilization plan activities for both law enforcement and civilian structures, as well as for evaluating the mobilization potential of industry and other sectors of the national economy and public administration bodies under conditions of natural, politico-military, socio-economic or other cataclysms.